Skip to content

Pratiquante de CrossFit, faisant l'exercice de frappe sur pneu

"Lifting weights & being strong doesn't win fights. Having great timing & being very intelligent wins fights." - Floyd Mayweather Jr

Mayweather is simply the latest of the greats to apparently dismiss weight / strength training. Bruce Lee, Mohamed Ali, Rocky Marciano & many others have said similar things & even refused to do weight training. Many claim that it will slow you down or reduce your endurance. Yet it's obvious that to be a fighter you do need strength along with the speed, endurance & timing (& intelligence) & of course they all did strength training even if it was 'just callisthenics & heavy bag work'. So why the apparent contradiction? There are 2 answers to that. The first & the reason I chose the Mayweather quote is, fighting is a very technical sport where posture, leverage & timing through good technique generates maximum power. Particularly in MMA where the athlete needs to be well rounded & possess the skills of multiple disciplines, by far the majority of a fighter's training time should be dedicated to skills acquisition. Conditioning, vital as it is, must always play a supporting role. The second, which we will look at in more detail later, is there is a big difference between 'body building' (which is / was for most synonymous with weight training) & functional sport specific strength / power training.

...continue reading "Fighting Fit"

2

gender in equality for self-defence

“In today’s world, if a woman is assaulted, she cannot expect or depend on anyone to help or protect her but herself. Victim behavior is learned behavior... Women can stop rape. They can do so by learning psychological and physical skills effectively to fight back.” - Dr. Judith Fein, Feminist self-defence author.

In this post we'll take a look at the particular problems faced by each gender in self-defence situations. Remember that the majority of violence is personal, the attacker is known to the victim & it is perpetrated against women. That is not to say that men are more violent than women nor even that women don't commit heinous violent acts. It is often argued that with women violence manifests verbally / psychologically & that men would rather not report attacks by women when they do occur (battered husband syndrome). Both of those arguments hold some truth (does verbal violence = physical violence?) but even taken to extreme they don't account for the disparity. Rather I would argue that it is the perception that women are easy victims. ...continue reading "Gender In Equality for Self-Defence"

4

I thought I would contribute my 2c worth on an endless debate. MMA is in parenthesise because the underlying principles apply irrespective of the rules. Fighting arts are defined by the rules under which they are contested. Boxing rules disallow kicks, knees, elbows, etc. while current MMA rules allow those & more but generally / currently disallow head-butts & on the street there are no rules. Irrespective of the tools / techniques at the striker's disposal it's the aptitude & application that I am concerned with here.

Fighting is as much science as art. Once the fundamental postures & movements are mastered a fighter needs to understand the principles that allow them to work. For some that understanding isn't intellectual, it's 'instinctive' (intuitive / subconscious maybe?). Instead of learning thousands of techniques & combinations the really good striker applies the principle to the situation. Great strikers are those that take it a step further & innovate. Essentially if a fighter is focused on getting in & out safely and not simply relying on reactions, speed, reach, power & a good chin, he is already a good striker (think black belt) in my opinion. By that definition at least 50% of pro boxers & closer to 80% of MMA pros aren't good let alone great (true masters). True greats are very rare...

...continue reading "A great (MMA) striker?"